"Everything has levels, and you just have to decide which . . ." [I lost the point here because he was going on to say something else. We eventually talked about George W. Bush and the title of this post was going to be "I Am the George W. Bush of Bloggers." And then I typed in "I'm" in the title bar, and it autofilled with: "I'm an Ethicist Now," "I'm Goin' All Preachy Now," "I'm going for a jog now," "I'm Just Blabbing Here, In List Form," "I'm Sister to the Queen of the Universe!" Should I list the titles that start with "I"? Geez, I hate my neurotic side, and I wish my irrationality wasn't the only part of me that made me relatable.]
I realize that I feel responsible for everything, and I never expect other people to feel responsible. [I realized this during a discussion on the ethics involved in me stealing an internet connection. And, by the way, I recommend
this article on the very same topic.]
I remembered Sister Ellie telling me that just because I see something is wrong, doesn't mean I am responsible for it. Which is true of everyone, of course.
I attach a moral judgment to the fact that some people don't even try.
"Out of all the things you have the ability to change, that ain't the one to do first."
How are we helping each other? We agree that we are living in a culture that is less concerned with everyone's rights. What we used to consider rights are now considered privileges . . . and there is an incivility that comes with that. That is to say, there is room here to increase our level of commitment to each other and to the greater good. Sargeant Shriver's death, Fran's death, . . . these give us room to believe that even trying to make a difference is important. Maybe we are imposing our own, limited values (in the case of the Peace Corps), but we are also trying to try something. (I have more sympathy for an attempt at something noble than a reluctance to try out of a desire to do no harm. What is the greater harm, we could ask. We could also ask, what is the greater good? It seems that those who don't believe in a greater good still believe in a greater harm.)
I'm saying I value this form of communication.
People are feeling and becoming more isolated and alone and, as a result, are interpreting "any opinion as intractable." "People are afraid of opinions. There is a reticence . . . and I think it has to do with the coarsening of society."
There is something about privacy in all of this.
To be associated with me, is to mean something.
"If you want to know me, then look at my art. Look at me through what I've done."
I've always said art is "balls again the wall." [I've actually never said that. I do say it's very important to look at what you're going to do when you think you have no other option.] What will you do when your soul has no other option? That is your art. And that is how we talk to each other. We relate at the height of our sensory experience--when we are the most engaged and sensory.
[I'm very used to being criticized. That's all it is. And I'm used to making a moral judgment and extrapolating a sense of worth from that criticism. I suppose I criticize all the time. I realized, earlier, why I was having such a hard time at school. I think they expect too much. I think the students think that I expect too much from them. That could be how this mirror is working. So to assuage that, I would like to receive a trillion more dollars (read: a lot of base reward) and to be heard on how I think they are doing things wrong. Actually, I don't even want to be heard because nothing is going wrong, I just don't think I can do a good job with what they want from me. And so I'm angry, and I honestly just don't see myself getting a whole lot better at managing all of these needs (I'm talking students who can't/don't read or write. I'm talking a student with ADHD. I'm talking students who barely speak, read, or write English. I'm talking religion. I'm talking about our education system, our family dynamics, our class status. I'm talking about our future and our cultures.). So I suppose I need the practice . . .
There's a difference, though, (isn't there? Maybe there isn't . . .) in respecting something for it's actual goodness rather than the good lesson it taught you.]
I'm very excited to receive acclaim for my writing . . . for my transcriptionist abilities. I can write well, he says. I'm just a thief. [I tell the students all writers are liars and they say they can't be writers because their religion doesn't allow lying. Assholes, I tell you, those seventh graders! I tell them to use their brains. I try to tell them that lying isn't just lying. It's not lost on them (not that this is an advanced thought); they just intentionally don't want to engage. When they do engage on a different point I get angry because they talk over each other, sound nasty, and leave some people behind. Am I only happy when I can direct the flow of conversation? That's the wrong question to ask.]
I don't want you to censor yourself; I want you to explain yourself.
"Life is sorta hard. And if people leave You with a sense of feeling that it was exhausting, then You need to change something."
I am more comfortable sharing my difference of opinion on religion than on arts. Or maybe I'm lying about that.
Maybe this story is like a religion to him.
It's a matter of respecting how important something is to someone else.